
Indian companies are racing ahead with AI, but India’s MBA classrooms are struggling to keep up. A nationwide MBAUniverse.com survey of faculty across IIMs, IITs, ISB, XLRI, SPJIMR, MDI and NMIMS found that only 7% of B-school faculty describe themselves as “expert users” of AI, while 55% say they are only “intermediate” users. At the same time, 51% of faculty do believe AI is positively impacting student learning, but they openly acknowledge they lack the depth to fully integrate it into teaching, curriculum and assessment.
This creates what we can call “The 7% Problem”: almost every MBA student in India is being prepared for an AI-heavy corporate world by faculty who are themselves still learning the basics of that technology. It’s not a criticism of professors, it’s a mismatch of speed. Industry is moving at AI velocity. Academia is updating at committee velocity.
On the other side of the campus wall, Indian enterprises are not just “experimenting” with AI anymore, many are operationalizing it. The NASSCOM EY AI Adoption Index 2.0 reports that while about 75% of organizations have their AI strategy at the proof-of-concept stage, 40% already show moderate-to-high maturity in moving AI from PoC to production. Another NASSCOM EY report notes that to become truly AI first, Indian enterprises must now focus on scaling these production deployments, not just running pilots.
Put simply: companies are building real AI systems that handle real money, real customers and real risk. At the same time, a majority of MBA faculty are still figuring out how to use ChatGPT to build lecture slides. The gap is not just technical; it’s experiential. Managers are expected to make decisions in AI-shaped markets but their education is still largely case-based and pre-AI in structure.
This is where AI-powered business simulations become more than a “nice-to-have.” They are, realistically, the only scalable way to bring industry-grade AI complexity into classrooms without waiting for every faculty member to become an AI specialist.
Commercial platforms like Cesim, Capstone and other strategy simulations already provide high-fidelity models of markets, supply chains and competitive dynamics. Cesim, for example, describes its simulations as “modern educational tools built on sound economic theory, designed to improve decision-making and teamwork skills.” Indian management schools such as ASB, KCT Business School and Taxila Business School have already incorporated these tools into their programs: KCT even runs Capstone-based workshops to expose students to integrated strategy decisions.
In this model, the 7 percent of AI-savvy faculty don’t have to build the technology from scratch. They simply select, configure and embed simulations into courses. The remaining faculty can focus on what they do best: debriefing, coaching and evaluating student judgment instead of worrying about writing code, tuning models or designing AI agents.
The second part of the solution is even more powerful for India: Generative AI dramatically lowers the cost of creating meaningful simulations, especially for soft skills and leadership.
A 2025 feature on AI in Indian campuses noted that nearly 77% of faculty surveyed had already used AI tools like ChatGPT mainly to summarize research papers, prepare slides or draft communication. And the MBAUniverse survey confirms that AI is used most in research and teaching, with curriculum-level integration still catching up. This means the comfort with conversational AI is already there.
The next step is simple but transformative: instead of using GenAI just to prepare lectures, faculty can use it to play roles inside simulations. With carefully designed prompts, an instructor at a Tier 2 or Tier 3 B-school can turn an AI system into:
Harvard Business Publishing and Wharton researchers have both shown that AI agents can function as mentors, evaluators and counterparts in practice environments, enabling “simulated practice at scale” where students repeatedly make decisions, receive feedback and reflect. The key is that none of this requires expensive enterprise licenses. A laptop, a faculty-designed prompt and a structured reflection exercise are enough to deliver a sophisticated conversational simulation.
Check out - Top 50 MBA Colleges in India | Top MBA Colleges in India
If simulations solve the 7% training bottleneck, they also address an equally important challenge on the hiring side: how to judge judgment. Recruiters consistently say they want graduates who can handle ambiguity, work with data and act under pressure, not just recount frameworks. The MBAUniverse/Times of India coverage makes it clear that while faculty see AI’s potential, they also worry about integrity, critical thinking and genuine learning outcomes.
AI simulations create a new kind of evidence: instead of only a CGPA and a list of courses, students can showcase:
As one AI adoption report on Indian enterprises notes, the real productivity gains come when “domain knowledge and data proficiency” are combined in the same person. That is exactly what simulation trained MBAs can demonstrate: not just knowledge of AI, but the ability to make decisions in AI-shaped contexts.
The 7% problem could be seen as a crisis, but it is also a once-in-a-generation opportunity. India already has:
Instead of waiting for every professor to become a data scientist, Indian B-schools can leapfrog: they can adopt AI simulations as the default learning layer and let faculty do what humans do best: mentor, challenge, contextualize and uphold ethics. As one summary of the MBAUniverse survey put it, the gap in expertise “signals huge opportunities for structured capacity-building programs” rather than a reason to retreat.
If Indian management education chooses this path, the question in a few years won’t be “Why are only 7% of faculty AI experts?” It will be: “Which schools built the smartest simulation ecosystems and which graduates have the strongest decision portfolios?” That is how India’s next generation of managers will close the AI gap: not by waiting for the classroom to catch up, but by learning inside the very AI-driven environments they’re about to lead.